Trezor
HARDWARE · NON_CUSTODIAL · Open source: YES
Audits: 2
Custody
Self-custody
Your keys, your control.
Security
20/100
Based on your internal scoring.
Platforms
—
Highlighted compatibility.
Quick action: add this wallet to the comparator or keep browsing.
Score
50
Summary
Hardware wallet.
Quick assessment
Visual bars and strengths/weaknesses derived from your data.
Score: 50
Security
20
Low
Usability
15
Low
Coverage
15
Low
Total
50
Average
Pros
- Self-custody (non-custodial)
- Hardware: better for cold storage
- Open source (transparency)
- Has recorded audits
Cons
- No WalletConnect
- No multisig
- No social recovery
- Limited platform support
Quick comparison
Difference vs the average of similar wallets (based on available data).
Total
50
—Similar avg: 50
Security
20
—Similar avg: 20
Usability
15
—Similar avg: 15
Coverage
15
—Similar avg: 15
Note: averages are computed using the similar wallets shown on this page.
Compare with similar wallets
Suggestions based on type/custody and available data (not a paid ranking).
Top alternatives
Options that often fit a similar profile (reasons derived from data).
Compatibility
iOS: NoAndroid: NoWindows: NomacOS: NoLinux: NoBrowser: No
Features
WalletConnect
NoSwap
NoStaking
NoNFTs
NoMultisig
NoSocial recovery
NoOn-ramp
NoAudits
- Unknown
- Unknown
Trust & methodology
Ranking
Data-driven
Transparency
Derived pros/cons
Comparison
Consistent criteria
This comparator does not assume personalized recommendations. We show attributes and signals based on available data (flags, audits, compatibility and scores).
FAQ
Is Trezor non-custodial?
Yes. Based on the data, it supports self-custody.
Does it have recorded audits?
Yes. There are 2 recorded audit(s).
Which operating systems are supported?
No compatibility data recorded yet.
Which chains/networks are supported?
No chains recorded yet.